Next: Speex License Up: The Speex Codec Manual Previous: Sample code Contents Index
AVT G. Herlein
Internet-Draft
Intended status: Standards Track J. Valin
Expires: October 24, 2007 University of Sherbrooke
A. Heggestad
April 22, 2007
RTP Payload Format for the Speex Codec
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-01 (non-final)
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on October 24, 2007.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2007).
Herlein, et al. Expires October 24, 2007 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Speex April 2007
Abstract
Speex is an open-source voice codec suitable for use in Voice over IP
(VoIP) type applications. This document describes the payload format
for Speex generated bit streams within an RTP packet. Also included
here are the necessary details for the use of Speex with the Session
Description Protocol (SDP).
Herlein, et al. Expires October 24, 2007 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Speex April 2007
Editors Note
All references to RFC XXXX are to be replaced by references to the
RFC number of this memo, when published.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. RTP usage for Speex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.1. RTP Speex Header Fields . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.2. RTP payload format for Speex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.3. Speex payload . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.4. Example Speex packet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.5. Multiple Speex frames in a RTP packet . . . . . . . . . . 7
4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.1. Media Type Registration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.1.1. Registration of media type audio/speex . . . . . . . . 9
5. SDP usage of Speex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
7. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . . . 18
Herlein, et al. Expires October 24, 2007 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Speex April 2007
1. Introduction
Speex is based on the CELP [CELP] encoding technique with support for
either narrowband (nominal 8kHz), wideband (nominal 16kHz) or ultra-
wideband (nominal 32kHz). The main characteristics can be summarized
as follows:
o Free software/open-source
o Integration of wideband and narrowband in the same bit-stream
o Wide range of bit-rates available
o Dynamic bit-rate switching and variable bit-rate (VBR)
o Voice Activity Detection (VAD, integrated with VBR)
o Variable complexity
To be compliant with this specification, implementations MUST support
8 kHz sampling rate (narrowband)" and SHOULD support 8 kbps bitrate.
The sampling rate MUST be 8, 16 or 32 kHz.
Herlein, et al. Expires October 24, 2007 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Speex April 2007
2. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC2119 [RFC2119] and
indicate requirement levels for compliant RTP implementations.
Herlein, et al. Expires October 24, 2007 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Speex April 2007
3. RTP usage for Speex
3.1. RTP Speex Header Fields
The RTP header is defined in the RTP specification [RFC3550]. This
section defines how fields in the RTP header are used.
Payload Type (PT): The assignment of an RTP payload type for this
packet format is outside the scope of this document; it is
specified by the RTP profile under which this payload format is
used, or signaled dynamically out-of-band (e.g., using SDP).
Marker (M) bit: The M bit is set to one to indicate that the RTP
packet payload contains at least one complete frame
Extension (X) bit: Defined by the RTP profile used.
Timestamp: A 32-bit word that corresponds to the sampling instant
for the first frame in the RTP packet.
3.2. RTP payload format for Speex
The RTP payload for Speex has the format shown in Figure 1. No
additional header fields specific to this payload format are
required. For RTP based transportation of Speex encoded audio the
standard RTP header [RFC3550] is followed by one or more payload data
blocks. An optional padding terminator may also be used.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| RTP Header |
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
| one or more frames of Speex .... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| one or more frames of Speex .... | padding |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 1: RTP payload for Speex
3.3. Speex payload
For the purposes of packetizing the bit stream in RTP, it is only
necessary to consider the sequence of bits as output by the Speex
encoder [speexenc], and present the same sequence to the decoder.
The payload format described here maintains this sequence.
A typical Speex frame, encoded at the maximum bitrate, is approx. 110
Herlein, et al. Expires October 24, 2007 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Speex April 2007
octets and the total number of Speex frames SHOULD be kept less than
the path MTU to prevent fragmentation. Speex frames MUST NOT be
fragmented across multiple RTP packets,
An RTP packet MAY contain Speex frames of the same bit rate or of
varying bit rates, since the bit-rate for a frame is conveyed in band
with the signal.
The encoding and decoding algorithm can change the bit rate at any 20
msec frame boundary, with the bit rate change notification provided
in-band with the bit stream. Each frame contains both "mode"
(narrowband, wideband or ultra-wideband) and "sub-mode" (bit-rate)
information in the bit stream. No out-of-band notification is
required for the decoder to process changes in the bit rate sent by
the encoder.
Sampling rate values of 8000, 16000 or 32000 Hz MUST be used. Any
other sampling rates MUST NOT be used.
The RTP payload MUST be padded to provide an integer number of octets
as the payload length. These padding bits are LSB aligned in network
octet order and consist of a 0 followed by all ones (until the end of
the octet). This padding is only required for the last frame in the
packet, and only to ensure the packet contents ends on an octet
boundary.
3.4. Example Speex packet
In the example below we have a single Speex frame with 5 bits of
padding to ensure the packet size falls on an octet boundary.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| RTP Header |
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
| ..speex data.. |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ..speex data.. |0 1 1 1 1|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
3.5. Multiple Speex frames in a RTP packet
Below is an example of two Speex frames contained within one RTP
packet. The Speex frame length in this example fall on an octet
boundary so there is no padding.
Speex codecs [speexenc] are able to detect the bitrate from the
Herlein, et al. Expires October 24, 2007 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Speex April 2007
payload and are responsible for detecting the 20 msec boundaries
between each frame.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| RTP Header |
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
| ..speex frame 1.. |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ..speex frame 1.. | ..speex frame 2.. |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ..speex frame 2.. |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Herlein, et al. Expires October 24, 2007 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Speex April 2007
4. IANA Considerations
This document defines the Speex media type.
4.1. Media Type Registration
This section describes the media types and names associated with this
payload format. The section registers the media types, as per
RFC4288 [RFC4288]
4.1.1. Registration of media type audio/speex
Media type name: audio
Media subtype name: speex
Required parameters:
None
Optional parameters:
ptime: see RFC 4566. SHOULD be a multiple of 20 msec.
maxptime: see RFC 4566. SHOULD be a multiple of 20 msec.
Encoding considerations:
This media type is framed and binary, see section 4.8 in
[RFC4288].
Security considerations: See Section 6
Interoperability considerations:
None.
Published specification: RFC XXXX [This RFC].
Applications which use this media type:
Audio streaming and conferencing applications.
Additional information: none
Person and email address to contact for further information :
Herlein, et al. Expires October 24, 2007 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft Speex April 2007
Alfred E. Heggestad: aeh@db.org
Intended usage: COMMON
Restrictions on usage:
This media type depends on RTP framing, and hence is only defined
for transfer via RTP [RFC3550]. Transport within other framing
protocols is not defined at this time.
Author: Alfred E. Heggestad
Change controller:
IETF Audio/Video Transport working group delegated from the IESG.
Herlein, et al. Expires October 24, 2007 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft Speex April 2007
5. SDP usage of Speex
When conveying information by SDP [RFC4566], the encoding name MUST
be set to "speex". An example of the media representation in SDP for
offering a single channel of Speex at 8000 samples per second might
be:
m=audio 8088 RTP/AVP 97
a=rtpmap:97 speex/8000
Note that the RTP payload type code of 97 is defined in this media
definition to be 'mapped' to the speex codec at an 8kHz sampling
frequency using the 'a=rtpmap' line. Any number from 96 to 127 could
have been chosen (the allowed range for dynamic types).
The value of the sampling frequency is typically 8000 for narrow band
operation, 16000 for wide band operation, and 32000 for ultra-wide
band operation.
If for some reason the offerer has bandwidth limitations, the client
may use the "b=" header, as explained in SDP [RFC4566]. The
following example illustrates the case where the offerer cannot
receive more than 10 kbit/s.
m=audio 8088 RTP/AVP 97
b=AS:10
a=rtmap:97 speex/8000
In this case, if the remote part agrees, it should configure its
Speex encoder so that it does not use modes that produce more than 10
kbit/s. Note that the "b=" constraint also applies on all payload
types that may be proposed in the media line ("m=").
An other way to make recommendations to the remote Speex encoder is
to use its specific parameters via the a=fmtp: directive. The
following parameters are defined for use in this way:
ptime: duration of each packet in milliseconds.
sr: actual sample rate in Hz.
ebw: encoding bandwidth - either 'narrow' or 'wide' or 'ultra'
(corresponds to nominal 8000, 16000, and 32000 Hz sampling rates).
Herlein, et al. Expires October 24, 2007 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft Speex April 2007
vbr: variable bit rate - either 'on' 'off' or 'vad' (defaults to
off). If on, variable bit rate is enabled. If off, disabled. If
set to 'vad' then constant bit rate is used but silence will be
encoded with special short frames to indicate a lack of voice for
that period.
cng: comfort noise generation - either 'on' or 'off'. If off then
silence frames will be silent; if 'on' then those frames will be
filled with comfort noise.
mode: Speex encoding mode. Can be {1,2,3,4,5,6,any} defaults to 3
in narrowband, 6 in wide and ultra-wide.
Examples:
m=audio 8008 RTP/AVP 97
a=rtpmap:97 speex/8000
a=fmtp:97 mode=4
This examples illustrate an offerer that wishes to receive a Speex
stream at 8000Hz, but only using speex mode 4.
Several Speex specific parameters can be given in a single a=fmtp
line provided that they are separated by a semi-colon:
a=fmtp:97 mode=any;mode=1
The offerer may indicate that it wishes to send variable bit rate
frames with comfort noise:
m=audio 8088 RTP/AVP 97
a=rtmap:97 speex/8000
a=fmtp:97 vbr=on;cng=on
The "ptime" attribute is used to denote the packetization interval
(ie, how many milliseconds of audio is encoded in a single RTP
packet). Since Speex uses 20 msec frames, ptime values of multiples
of 20 denote multiple Speex frames per packet. Values of ptime which
are not multiples of 20 MUST be ignored and clients MUST use the
default value of 20 instead.
Implementations SHOULD support ptime of 20 msec (i.e. one frame per
packet)
In the example below the ptime value is set to 40, indicating that
Herlein, et al. Expires October 24, 2007 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft Speex April 2007
there are 2 frames in each packet.
m=audio 8008 RTP/AVP 97
a=rtpmap:97 speex/8000
a=ptime:40
Note that the ptime parameter applies to all payloads listed in the
media line and is not used as part of an a=fmtp directive.
Values of ptime not multiple of 20 msec are meaningless, so the
receiver of such ptime values MUST ignore them. If during the life
of an RTP session the ptime value changes, when there are multiple
Speex frames for example, the SDP value must also reflect the new
value.
Care must be taken when setting the value of ptime so that the RTP
packet size does not exceed the path MTU.
Herlein, et al. Expires October 24, 2007 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft Speex April 2007
6. Security Considerations
RTP packets using the payload format defined in this specification
are subject to the security considerations discussed in the RTP
specification [RFC3550], and any appropriate RTP profile. This
implies that confidentiality of the media streams is achieved by
encryption. Because the data compression used with this payload
format is applied end-to-end, encryption may be performed after
compression so there is no conflict between the two operations.
A potential denial-of-service threat exists for data encodings using
compression techniques that have non-uniform receiver-end
computational load. The attacker can inject pathological datagrams
into the stream which are complex to decode and cause the receiver to
be overloaded. However, this encoding does not exhibit any
significant non-uniformity.
As with any IP-based protocol, in some circumstances a receiver may
be overloaded simply by the receipt of too many packets, either
desired or undesired. Network-layer authentication may be used to
discard packets from undesired sources, but the processing cost of
the authentication itself may be too high.
Herlein, et al. Expires October 24, 2007 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft Speex April 2007
7. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Equivalence Pty Ltd of Australia for
their assistance in attempting to standardize the use of Speex in
H.323 applications, and for implementing Speex in their open source
OpenH323 stack. The authors would also like to thank Brian C. Wiles
<brian@streamcomm.com> of StreamComm for his assistance in developing
the proposed standard for Speex use in H.323 applications.
The authors would also like to thank the following members of the
Speex and AVT communities for their input: Ross Finlayson, Federico
Montesino Pouzols, Henning Schulzrinne, Magnus Westerlund.
Thanks to former authors of this document; Simon Morlat, Roger
Hardiman, Phil Kerr
Herlein, et al. Expires October 24, 2007 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft Speex April 2007
8. References
8.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC3550] Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V.
Jacobson, "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time
Applications", STD 64, RFC 3550, July 2003.
[RFC4566] Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, "SDP: Session
Description Protocol", RFC 4566, July 2006.
8.2. Informative References
[CELP] "CELP, U.S. Federal Standard 1016.", National Technical
Information Service (NTIS) website http://www.ntis.gov/.
[RFC4288] Freed, N. and J. Klensin, "Media Type Specifications and
Registration Procedures", BCP 13, RFC 4288, December 2005.
[speexenc]
Valin, J., "Speexenc/speexdec, reference command-line
encoder/decoder", Speex website http://www.speex.org/.
Herlein, et al. Expires October 24, 2007 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft Speex April 2007
Authors' Addresses
Greg Herlein
2034 Filbert Street
San Francisco, California 94123
United States
Email: gherlein@herlein.com
Jean-Marc Valin
University of Sherbrooke
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
University of Sherbrooke
2500 blvd Universite
Sherbrooke, Quebec J1K 2R1
Canada
Email: jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca
Alfred E. Heggestad
Biskop J. Nilssonsgt. 20a
Oslo 0659
Norway
Email: aeh@db.org
Herlein, et al. Expires October 24, 2007 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft Speex April 2007
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2007).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgment
Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
Administrative Support Activity (IASA).
Herlein, et al. Expires October 24, 2007 [Page 18]